Argument Model 1

The argument is(not well reasoned ) unwarranted because it rests on the questionable (unsound) assumption (premise) that 題目

Evidently, there is no hard evidence to back up this assumption.Besdies......

This argument is somewhat appealing at first glance, but a close examination reveals that it is logically untenable.

I do not think the argument is logically convincing because it is based on the writer's own speculation rather than on the result of a study or on government-released information.

Here are some reason why .
*****************************************************************************

(The first assumption is questionable )First of all, it is a well-known fact that

XXX is likely to be seen as merely the tip of the iceberg.

Last but not least,

It is impetuous to XXXX (魯莽)

Unless the author lists XXXX, the generalization is wrong.

First of all, oversimplification makes the argument invalid because the author overlooks certain major consideration.

****************************************************************************
In addition,

He does not take into account other factors such as XXXXX

There is no guarantee that this is always the case

From this point of view,

以偏概全
What works for A will not necessarily work for B

The fact that XXXX may be a matter of coincidence, not cause and effect.
*****************************************************************************

In summary, the assumptions on which its conclusion is based make a faulty analogy between ......


Without statistical evidence that xxxxxx, the argument in the passage would be without merit and logically unsound.

In conclusion, this argument is invalid. To strength the argument, the writer needs conclusive evidence to back up his recommendation.

We must thus conclude that the author has failed to demonstrate the truth of his conclusion.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

study -->

First of all, the credibility if the phrase "studies suggest" is in doubt because the firm fails to show enough information on the source of the studies. If people do not trust the validity of the studies, the suggestion offered by those studies will be meaningless. On the contrary, if the studies were conducted by a reliable institution such as Gallup, the argument would be more convincing.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^